jump to main content
graphic masthead for Goshen Central School District
227 Main Street
Goshen, NY 10924
(845) 615.6720
Roy Reese
Superintendent
link to District Homepage link to Scotchtown Elementary page link to Goshen Intermediate School link to C.J. Hooker Middle School link to Goshen High School
graphic of Noah Webster
graphic of "trotter" logo

Ask the Superintendent - March 28, 2008


In last week’s column, I shared with readers that after a careful discussion and reflection, the Board of Education approved two propositions to be placed on the ballot at the Annual Budget Vote and School Board Election to be held on Tuesday, May 20th. This week and next, I will explain in greater detail the importance and necessity of these two propositions.

The District Facilities Improvement Proposition is critical to address our aging infrastructure. I am proud to say, and have even said frequently, our buildings are clean and pristine on the inside and out. However, their age, wear and tear from weather and use require extensive maintenance. The Main Street building was built in 1915; the CJ Hooker Middle School was built in 1939; Scotchtown Avenue School was built in 1958; the Intermediate School was built in 1967, and the High School was built in 1976. Older buildings require more attention to their infrastructure. All of the 9 projects proposed were either part of the District Master Planning process (a requirement of the State mandated 5-year Building Condition Survey) or were to be addressed as a portion of the capital building project which failed last December. Seven of the nine projects will qualify for New York State Building Aid at an aid ratio of 58.4%.
  • The High School has aging burners, which are original to the building. Even with regular maintenance, the highest operational efficiency rate is only 70%. With today’s technology and the cost of fuel, a 70% efficiency rating is totally unacceptable. Additionally, if the burners are not burning fuel efficiently, they are also creating additional pollutants and emissions. Replacement parts for these new burners are virtually unavailable and recently some parts have had to be custom made (a very expensive fix) at machine shops. It is estimated that the fuel savings alone will pay for these two burners in approximately 5 years. Total cost for this project: $165,000.
     
  • The elevator at the High School is also original equipment and is the only elevator in the building. Due to its age, it is also difficult to obtain parts. It is the only access to the second floor for handicapped individuals and for freight. Total cost for this project: $98,000.
     
  • The Intermediate School elevator is 17 years old and parts are also hard to find. It is also the only elevator in the building and is necessary (like the High School) to be in compliance with the American Disability Act (ADA) as well as for getting freight to the second floor. Total cost for this project is $65,000.

    These elevators are not going to be replaced. These repairs are for replacement of the controls only.
     
  • The bleachers at the Middle School athletic field, due to aging, have become structurally compromised. The District’s architectural firm has recommended they be taken out of service immediately and removed because they are unsafe for spectators. The bleachers contain lead paint and require hazmat abatement along with their removal. Demolition and removal of the bleachers will cost $80,000 and replacement will be $310,000. It should be noted these bleachers came to our school from the old “Good Time Park” and have served us well over the many years.
     
  • The windows at the CJ Hooker Middle School in the auditorium and gymnasium are original to the building and are architecturally beautiful. Unfortunately, they only have single pane glass which is energy inefficient and have weathered badly. In order to be preserved, they need major restoration with regard to structure, lead paint abatement, glazing, and repainting. It is estimated that the restoration cost is $280,000. We are also looking at (based upon the architect’s recommendation) the possibility of replacing them with historically acceptable, energy efficient windows. This will take additional study and will only be considered if they meet the requirements of all the historical codes.

Next week I will share the remaining four projects as well as the Transportation proposition.

Also explained will be the total cost of both projects, the State Aid breakdown, and the cost to residents.

Roy Reese
Superintendent of Schools