jump to main content
graphic masthead for C.J. Hooker Middle School  
link to District Homepage link to Scotchtown Elementary page link to Goshen Intermediate School link to C.J. Hooker Middle School link to Goshen High School
 

(back)

Roaring Twenties / Harlem Renaissance Project

Due Monday, March 3, 2008

Test Grade

Group Work Rubric

Presentation Rubric

 

The time after WWI was an era of cultural movements, music, art, and adventure.  For this reason, the 1920’s are known as the Roaring Twenties.  You will be completing a project involving researching a topic and then present it to the class.  You will have three computer lab periods and a weekend to work on this 1920’s project worth a test grade.   The project and the presentation will combine to create your total score.  Topics will range from the worlds of sports, art, music, literature, movies, politics, law, biography, and many other topics. 

 

You will work with an ASSIGNED partner to complete this project.  You will be graded on your individual effort as well as your group work.  It is possible that a grouping can end up with an A and an F as letter grades.    

 

Utilize the links provided to help you complete your task. 

 

 

Here is a list of projects you may complete:

Mobile – use a clothes hanger or some small sticks, hang strings down with images and information – present it to the class

Song – write, or revise an existing song with new lyrics and sing it

Dance – perform a dance with music from the time period and explain

Other performance – such as a scene from a play or movie and explain

Diorama – build a shoebox representation of your topic and explain

Advertisement – make an “authentic” advertisement about your topic and explain

News broadcast – create a news broadcast to present to the class

PowerPoint - explaining your topic (potentially mind-numbingly boring unless good effort is put forth)

Other – ask Mr. Redeker for approval

 

 

 

Politics and Normalcy Movies Harlem Renaissance
Sacco and Vanzetti Trial Scopes Monkey Trial Jazz
Organized Crime Marcus Garvey Literature
Shopping Fads Ku Klux Klan
Flappers Aviation Sports

 

 


 


Politics and Normalcy

http://www.tqnyc.org/NYC063369/people.htm

http://www.tqnyc.org/NYC063369/events.htm (Teapot Dome Scandal)

 

(top)

Sacco and Vanzetti

http://www.courttv.com/archive/greatesttrials/sacco.vanzetti/

http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/SaccoV/SaccoV.htm

 

(top)

Organized Crime

http://www.gangrule.com/

http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/history/lawless.htm

Al Capone

http://www.chicagohs.org/history/capone.html

 (top)

Shopping

http://www.1920-30.com/business/

http://www.1920-30.com/business/instalment-selling.html

 

(top)

Flappers

http://www.fashion-era.com/flapper_fashion_1920s.htm

http://ehistory.osu.edu/osu/mmh/clash/NewWoman/newwoman-index.htm

http://faculty.pittstate.edu/~knichols/jazzage.html#flapper

http://www.1920-30.com/fashion/the-bob.html

http://www.geocities.com/flapper_culture/appeal.html

 

(top)

Movies

http://www.1920-30.com/movies/

http://www.filmsite.org/20sintro.html

http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/gish.htm

            Charlie Chaplin

            http://www.tqnyc.org/NYC063369/entertainment.htm

 

(top)

Scopes Monkey Trial

http://ehistory.osu.edu/osu/mmh/clash/Scopes/scopes-index.htm

http://www.courttv.com/archive/greatesttrials/scopes/

http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/scopes/scopes.htm

 

(top)

Marcus Garvey

http://www.tqnyc.org/NYC063369/people.htm

http://www.swagga.com/marcus.htm

 

(top)

FADS:

Flagpole Sitting

http://www.badfads.com/pages/events/flagpole.html

Dance Marathons

http://www.wunderland.com/WTS/Renee/DanceMarathons.html

Dances

http://www.homesteadmuseum.org/jtt/1920s%20charleston.pdf

http://www.mixedpickles.org/jazzdance.html

Games

http://www.mahjongmuseum.com/brief.htm

 

 (top)

Aviation

Charles Lindbergh

http://www.1920-30.com/aviation/

http://www.charleslindbergh.com/

Amelia Earhart

http://www.ameliaearhart.com/home.php

http://www.ellensplace.net/eae_intr.html

 

 (top)

Harlem Renaissance

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EPF/is_18_101/ai_82650370

http://faculty.pittstate.edu/~knichols/jazzage.html#harlem

http://www.levity.com/corduroy/harlem.htm

 

(top)

Jazz

http://lcweb2.loc.gov/ammem/wghtml/wghome.html

http://www.1920-30.com/music/

Louis Armstrong

http://www.time.com/time/time100/artists/profile/armstrong.html

http://www.satchmo.net/

http://www.redhotjazz.com/louie.html

 

(top)

Literature

F.Scott Fitzgerald

http://faculty.pittstate.edu/~knichols/jazzage3.html#lost

Langston Hughes

http://faculty.pittstate.edu/~knichols/jazzage3.html#harlem

 

(top)

Ku Klux Klan

http://ehistory.osu.edu/osu/mmh/clash/Imm_KKK/antiimmigrationKKK-index.htm

 

(top)

Sports

http://www.1920-30.com/sports/

http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/blacksox/blacksox.html

http://www.fsmitha.com/h2/ch15-7.htm

http://www.answers.com/topic/1920-in-sports

(top)

 


 

Group Work 1

TaskStream - Tools of Engagement
10  15  20  Score
Skill development for task  Assumes others will learn skill. Makes no effort to acquire expertise in skill.  Satisfied with general understanding of skill, but will not go for competence.  Will learn skill when it is necessary. Usually minimum competence to complete task.  Readily learns new skills as a matter of course. Seeks to extend the skill.   
Creativity  Boundaries set by the fulfilling of minimum requirements. No personal input or attempt to enhance.  Has an occasional new idea, but little follow through. Products are completed in an acceptable form.  Has new ideas or ways of doing things, but may be reluctant to deploy. Products always well done for requirements  Formulates new ideas or new ways of doing things. Products exceed requirements in design and/or content.   
Understanding of the process  Avoids teacher Sees task as burden to fill class time with no value. Sees group as free ride.  Sees task as burden, but is somewhat invested in process. Asks, "Do we have to �?" Sees teacher as task master.  Sees task as a school requirement to be filled, but sees some value in work. Sees teacher as evaluator and helper.   Sees opportunity in task for doing and learning. Sees value in the work. Sees teacher as colleague/mentor.   
Intellectual contribution  Has little or no grasp of context. Sees task as isolated with no connection to past or future ideas.  Aware of overall context, but makes no connections on own. Can recite connections of others but rarely can support them.  Usually understands overall context of task and asks questions about context. Makes connections on own and "gets" those others make.  Understands overall context of the task. Contributes ideas and proposals. Extends connections to ideas past and future.   
Effort  Actively avoids jobs when possible. Complains about others. Has large set of excuses.   Reluctantly does jobs when asked. Seeks easiest duties in group. Sometimes works to completion.  Willingly takes on jobs when asked. Works to completion. Will work long hours when required.   Volunteers for jobs no matter how difficult Always works to completion. Willing to work long hours.   

(top)

 

 

 

 

Presentation 1

TaskStream - Tools of Engagement
10  15  20  Score
Clarity  No apparent logical order of presentation, unclear focus   Content is loosely connected, transitions lack clarity  Sequence of information is well-organized for the most part, but more clarity with transitions is needed  Development of thesis is clear through use of specific and appropriate examples; transitions are clear and create a succinct and even flow   
Presentation Length  Greatly exceeding or falling short of allotted time   Exceeding or falling short of allotted time  Remained close to the allotted time  Presented within the allotted time   
Content  Thesis is unclear and information appears randomly chosen  Thesis is clear, but supporting information is disconnected  Information relates to a clear thesis; many relevant points, but they are somewhat unstructured  Exceptional use of material that clearly relates to a focused thesis; abundance of various supported materials   
Creativity  Delivery is repetitive with little or no variety in presentation techniques  Material presented with little interpretation or originality  Some apparent originality displayed through use of original interpretation of presented materials  Exceptional originality of presented material and interpretation   
Speaking Skills  Monotone; speaker seemed uninterested in material  Little eye contact; fast speaking rate, little expression, mumbling  Clear articulation of ideas, but apparently lacks confidence with material  Exceptional confidence with material displayed through poise, clear articulation, eye contact, and enthusiasm   

(top)